If Barack Obama was gay…
If Barack Obama was gay, he would have just signed an executive order giving himself, a federal employee, some additional benefits. Let’s see how that might change the lives of Barack and, well, Michael.
The new benefits include:
- Barack can now sign up Michael for long-term care insurance.
- Barack can now use his sick leave to care for Michael and Michael’s dependents. (I’m not sure how many sick days a President is allowed — I imagine it’s as many as he needs.)
- If Barack is assigned to move overseas,* Michael can be included when determining family size for the housing allocation, and he will be able to use the overseas medical facilities. In the event of an emergency, Michael will eligible to be evacuated.
That’s it. Nothing more.
Michael will still not be able to:
- Have health insurance provided through Barack’s employer,
- Benefit from his pension should Barack pre-decease him,
- Visit his partner or his partner’s children if hospitalized when traveling to any of the more than forty states that do not recognize his marriage to Barack,
- Travel safely with Barack when visiting Saudi Arabia or Iran or any other county in which homosexuality is punishable by death, or
- Have any of the other 1,138 US federal benefits identified by our General Accounting Office (GAO) which are contingent upon his marital status.
One more thing is wrong with this scenario: if Barack Obama was gay, he would never have been elected president. I’m very proud that my nation elected an African-American to be president, and honestly, I think he’s doing a terrific job with the mess that he was left by the previous administration. But I cannot suspend my disbelief long enough to imagine that blue-and-red America could vote a gay man into the White House. We had a hard enough time envisioning Bill Clinton as First Gentleman, let alone Michael. Perhaps that day will come, someday.
For today, I believe that Mr. Obama, with a stroke of his pen, gave as many rights as he was legally empowered to grant to federal employees. I hope that the next few years bring many more days of equality for all citizens.
*Granted, not likely for a president.
By day, Helen engineers new materials to make computer chips cheaper, better, and faster. When the son goes down (pun intended), she writes about personal finance at Affine Financial Services.
Memorandum, not order. Expires at the end of his term. Otherwise, very well-put.
Great post, Helen. I think that things would definitely be a little different if we had a gay president, but you said it – it’s not going to happen.
Helen: Bravo! You make an excellent point in a clever way. I’m still surprised at how many people don’t know about the 1000+ benefits we miss out on because our state-sanctioned marriages/domestic partnerships are not recognized at the federal level. Awareness is key. Thanks for spreading the word!
I thought we already had elected a gay President?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Buchanan#Personal_relationships
He didn’t even really give people new rights though, federal employers were already able to offer these benefits. The difference is now federal agencies are being ordered to give benefits most of them were giving anyway.
Pixiedyke: Thanks for the correction.
RazzBari: I hadn’t read about Buchanan until today, thanks! Gee, do you think he’s related to Pat? That would be fun to prove.
Wolverine: I do think it’s a little crumby. I think it’s a PR failure. He should have lowered expectations. When I read the title, I got kinda worked up with a little fist-pumping whoo-hoo! And then I read the fine print, and it was disappointing.